โ† Back to portal

Investment Fee Drag Calculator โ€“ Compare Fund Fees Over Decades

See how a 0.2% vs 1% fund fee compounds into tens of thousands over time

๐Ÿ“‹ Investment & Fee Details

Net rate: rnet = r โˆ’ f then A = P(1 + rnet/n)nt + contributions
$
$
%
yr
%
%

Your entries are stored in this browser only and restored next time you open the page.

๐Ÿ“Š Results

Wealth Gap (Fee Drag)
โ€”
Fund A Future Balance
โ€”
Fund B Future Balance
โ€”
Total Contributions
โ€”
Gap as % of Fund A
โ€”
๐Ÿ“ Fee Drag Insight
Fund B vs Fund A
โ€”
Drag is larger than the fees collected because units sold to pay fees never compound.
Gap at year 10
โ€”
Gap at year 20
โ€”
Gap at year 30
โ€”
Fund A Balance
Fund B Balance
Contributions Only

๐Ÿ“… Year-by-Year Breakdown

Year Contributions Fund A Fund B Gap
Adjust inputs to see results

How to Use the Investment Fee Drag Calculator

The free Investment Fee Drag Calculator shows how two ongoing fund fees โ€” typically a low-cost 0.2% index fee versus a 1% active or wrapped fee โ€” compound into a large gap in ending wealth. Enter the same starting balance, contributions, gross return and time horizon for both funds; only the annual fee differs. Results update live with a comparison chart and a year-by-year table.

Step-by-Step Guide

1. Input Your Investment Details

Begin by configuring the parameters that match your plan. Both funds use the same market-return assumption; the only modelled difference is the annual fee.

2. Calculate the Drag

Results update automatically as soon as you change any input. Each path uses a net annual rate equal to the gross return minus that fundโ€™s fee, then the same contribution and compounding engine as the suiteโ€™s Compound Growth Calculator:

Net rate: rnet = r โˆ’ f  ยท  A = P(1 + rnet/n)nt + monthly contributions

You can explore different fee gaps in real time simply by adjusting the values above.

3. Interpret the Results

After calculation, the app displays five core metrics under the Results section:

4. Use Additional Features

Tip: Lengthen the period from 20 to 30 or 40 years with the same fees. The extra decade usually adds more drag than the decade before it, because the fee is levied on a larger balance.

Common Scenarios & Examples

Scenario: Index ETF vs Active Fund

Goal: See whether a 0.80 percentage-point fee gap is โ€œonly 0.8%โ€ after three decades of regular investing.

  1. Select your preferred currency (e.g. USD).
  2. Enter an Initial Investment of $10,000.
  3. Set Monthly Contribution to $200.
  4. Enter an Expected Gross Annual Return of 7%.
  5. Set Investment Period to 30 years.
  6. Leave Fund A at 0.20% and Fund B at 1.00%, or tap the Index vs Active preset.
  7. Choose Monthly compounding.
  8. Read the wealth gap, chart and year-by-year table as they update.
Sample Inputs:
  • Initial Investment: $10,000
  • Monthly Contribution: $200
  • Gross Annual Return: 7%
  • Investment Period: 30 years
  • Fund A Fee: 0.20%  |  Fund B Fee: 1.00%
  • Compounding Frequency: Monthly

Approximate results: Fund A โ‰ˆ $312,000  |  Fund B โ‰ˆ $262,000  |  Wealth gap โ‰ˆ $50,000 (~16% of Fund A)

At year 10 the gap is only about $3,000. By year 20 it is about $15,000. By year 30 it is about $50,000. The fee did not stay โ€œ0.8% a yearโ€ in cash terms โ€” it compounded against a rising balance.

Scenario: Cheap ETF vs Adviser Wrap

Goal: Estimate the long-run cost of layering a 1% advice / platform charge on a larger regular-investment pot.

  1. Set Initial Investment to $50,000 and Monthly Contribution to $500.
  2. Keep a 7% gross return and a 30-year horizon.
  3. Tap Cheap ETF vs Advisor wrap (0.07 / 1.00), or type those fees yourself.
Sample Inputs:
  • Initial Investment: $50,000
  • Monthly Contribution: $500
  • Gross Annual Return: 7%
  • Investment Period: 30 years
  • Fund A Fee: 0.07%  |  Fund B Fee: 1.00%

Approximate results: Fund A โ‰ˆ $1,003,000  |  Fund B โ‰ˆ $806,000  |  Wealth gap โ‰ˆ $197,000

Why 0.8 percentage points is not โ€œonly 0.8%โ€

Goal: Separate the annual fee rate from the share of terminal wealth it consumes.

  1. Use the default 0.20% vs 1.00% pair (a 0.80 percentage-point gap).
  2. Set the period to 30 years and read Gap as % of Fund A.
  3. A linear shortcut of 0.80% ร— 30 years = 24% overstates the loss; the live figure is closer to 16% of Fund Aโ€™s ending value on the default contribution path โ€” still far larger than โ€œ0.8%โ€.
Rule of thumb vs compounding:

A 1% annual TER does not cost 1% of your final pot. Over decades it commonly costs a mid-teens to mid-twenties share of ending wealth, because each yearโ€™s fee shrinks the base that future returns can compound on.

Disclaimer & Limitations

Not Professional Advice: This calculator is provided as an estimation and educational tool and does not constitute professional financial advice. Actual investment returns vary and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Consult a qualified financial advisor for advice tailored to your situation.

Assumptions: Both paths share the same constant gross annual return. The annual fee is subtracted from that rate (net rate = gross โˆ’ TER). Contributions are added at the start of each month. The model does not include trading costs, bidโ€“ask spreads, platform fees beyond the TER you enter, front-end loads, taxes or inflation, and it does not credit Fund B with any outperformance.

Estimation Purposes Only: The year-by-year table and chart are illustrative. Real-world portfolios experience market volatility, contribution changes, and other factors not fully captured here. Fee drag is the difference in ending balances โ€” it is larger than the sum of fees collected because lost units never compound.

Bug Reports and Suggested Improvements

Please email all suggestions for improvements and any bug reports to: feedragcalc@personalfinances.me, thank you.