See how a 0.2% vs 1% fund fee compounds into tens of thousands over time
rnet = r โ f then A = P(1 + rnet/n)nt + contributions
Your entries are stored in this browser only and restored next time you open the page.
| Year | Contributions | Fund A | Fund B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjust inputs to see results | ||||
The free Investment Fee Drag Calculator shows how two ongoing fund fees โ typically a low-cost 0.2% index fee versus a 1% active or wrapped fee โ compound into a large gap in ending wealth. Enter the same starting balance, contributions, gross return and time horizon for both funds; only the annual fee differs. Results update live with a comparison chart and a year-by-year table.
Begin by configuring the parameters that match your plan. Both funds use the same market-return assumption; the only modelled difference is the annual fee.
Results update automatically as soon as you change any input. Each path uses a net annual rate equal to the gross return minus that fundโs fee, then the same contribution and compounding engine as the suiteโs Compound Growth Calculator:
rnet = r โ f ยท A = P(1 + rnet/n)nt + monthly contributions
You can explore different fee gaps in real time simply by adjusting the values above.
After calculation, the app displays five core metrics under the Results section:
Tip: Lengthen the period from 20 to 30 or 40 years with the same fees. The extra decade usually adds more drag than the decade before it, because the fee is levied on a larger balance.
Goal: See whether a 0.80 percentage-point fee gap is โonly 0.8%โ after three decades of regular investing.
Approximate results: Fund A โ $312,000 | Fund B โ $262,000 | Wealth gap โ $50,000 (~16% of Fund A)
At year 10 the gap is only about $3,000. By year 20 it is about $15,000. By year 30 it is about $50,000. The fee did not stay โ0.8% a yearโ in cash terms โ it compounded against a rising balance.
Goal: Estimate the long-run cost of layering a 1% advice / platform charge on a larger regular-investment pot.
Approximate results: Fund A โ $1,003,000 | Fund B โ $806,000 | Wealth gap โ $197,000
Goal: Separate the annual fee rate from the share of terminal wealth it consumes.
A 1% annual TER does not cost 1% of your final pot. Over decades it commonly costs a mid-teens to mid-twenties share of ending wealth, because each yearโs fee shrinks the base that future returns can compound on.
Not Professional Advice: This calculator is provided as an estimation and educational tool and does not constitute professional financial advice. Actual investment returns vary and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Consult a qualified financial advisor for advice tailored to your situation.
Assumptions: Both paths share the same constant gross annual return. The annual fee is subtracted from that rate (net rate = gross โ TER). Contributions are added at the start of each month. The model does not include trading costs, bidโask spreads, platform fees beyond the TER you enter, front-end loads, taxes or inflation, and it does not credit Fund B with any outperformance.
Estimation Purposes Only: The year-by-year table and chart are illustrative. Real-world portfolios experience market volatility, contribution changes, and other factors not fully captured here. Fee drag is the difference in ending balances โ it is larger than the sum of fees collected because lost units never compound.
Please email all suggestions for improvements and any bug reports to: feedragcalc@personalfinances.me, thank you.